Does it tell me exactly what I want to hear, and indeed what I already knew? Yes. The vanguard American horror films of the 1970s are my personal Bob Dylan. Both Dylan and Romero/Hooper/Craven were uncompromising voices of socio-critical outrage, in a way all the more powerful because they utilized genres (folk, horror films) that could be taken as totems of complacency (“the groundfolks music of yesteryear reminding us that hardship is behind us”; “vampires and zombies don’t really exist”… okay, I stretch a little bit on the folk-being-complacent part, but then again I don’t dig folk too much either). In this sense, director Adam Simon is fashioning a fantastic patchwork of film theories and ideas that have been around for some time now. It’s never less than engrossing, and all of the interviewees (including the non-director but still highly influential make-up effects artist Tom Savini) paint a vivid picture of what nourished their nasty impulses. But where American Nightmare really takes off is in the final few minutes, where the elegiac sense of closure and a strange sense of nostalgia for the tumultuous ‘60s and ‘70s (indeed, it’s almost like a miniature Grin Without a Cat substituting Che Guevara with Leatherface) make one question where horror films, much less society, can turn to next. Granted, many of the directors concerned have still been making interesting films that comment on what’s happening today — take Cronenberg’s Crash and, I’m told, Carpenter’s Ghosts of Mars — but what’s missing is the sense that, for instance, automobile necrophilia and space exploration burrow as deeply into our identity as a nation of fury as mechanized plant “efficiency” and NRA vigilantism did thirtysome years ago. It’s probably damning that just about the only recent horror film from this group of visionaries that did any significant business is the one by Wes Craven that basically turns the retrospectively reactionary stance of Carpenter’s Halloween into a punchline. The death of feminism and the return to clearly marked divisions between good and evil (which I stress are much more clearly expressed in Halloween’s copycats than in Carpenter’s film, which is far too streamlined to be able to stick on too many ideological conclusions) become, in Scream, the set up to one colossal joke. It’s exactly what Carpenter alludes to when he jokes about all of them being too concerned now with “making money” to create more grit and discontent. When Simon juxtaposes the locations of mass revolutionary gatherings in the full bloom of the Summer of Love with modern-day shots of those same gathering spots in the middle of winter and notably devoid of humans, it’s as though all that brutal honesty and all that spent insanity still couldn’t stop the steamroller of blithe denial. I’ve left out one other film between Halloween and Scream that needs to be mentioned (well, maybe two, since I consider the underrated Day of the Dead’s portrait of humanity sliding into complete and utter nihilism remarkable). Ironically, one decade after Carpenter supposedly brought the horror revolution to a close he delivered what I guess can be considered a latecoming last gasp: 1988’s They Live, which, considering its take on the simultaneously destroying and assuaging effects of the unholy ambiguity between social structure and media omnipresence, will probably only continue to gain resonance (unless Snake Plissken unplugs the world like he did at the end of Escape from L.A.).
Movie Reviews | No Comments »